Re: Sourceforge - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Jason Petersen
Subject Re: Sourceforge
Date
Msg-id 8FAF1235-420F-44E4-B1C1-B7FFF6473021@citusdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sourceforge  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Sourceforge
List pgsql-advocacy
> On May 28, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
> We don't have legal ability to restrict them period. We are BSD licensed. The best we can do is put up a PSA.

Today a coworker mused whether we could issue a C&D for misuse of trademark if it comes to that. Maybe?

> That said, SF doesn't have the traffic to harm us. I am not worried about it. We aren't a web browser or something
"users"would download (like Gimp). 

We came to the same conclusion at lunch today. I wondered aloud whether Oracle would ever extend their [shameful
practices][1]to MySQL, and someone pointed out that it’s probably only worthwhile to do so for apps likely to be
installedon end-user machines. Adware in server software is not going to pay off. 

I saw [at least one project][2] which retained control over its SF account but rather than deleting it just turned off
allread access. Might be a possibility. 

[1]: http://www.zdnet.com/article/oracle-extends-its-adware-bundling-to-include-java-for-macs/
[2]: https://twitter.com/OOLua/status/603908660264316928

--
Jason Petersen
Software Engineer | Citus Data
303.736.9255
jason@citusdata.com


Attachment

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Sourceforge
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Sourceforge