Home

antw - Search results

List

Post date

Sort by

antw]* in \df[antw]*[S+]--and patterns. Does this sound reasonable? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter

antw" options. I changed "PATTERN" to "PATRN" so I would not have to shift over

antw][S+]. The extra brackets are obviously redundant, but if we're about providing cues

antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list {only agg/normal/trigger/window} functions that would make sense, but we don't have

antw][S+] [ pattern ] --- 1038,1044 ---- ! \df[antwS

antw}[S+] [PATRN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions In a way though, they are really still

antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions (one line only, removing the second redundant line). This

antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions Technically, it should probably be even more verbose

antw][S+] [ pattern ] ! Lists available functions, together with their arguments, ! return types, and their function

antw], which lets people narrow their search. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ Phone