Thread: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. > > This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something* > here. (yes, i've been backlogged) We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is. But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them both on the same bullet point? -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
>>
>> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
>> here.
> We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
> But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
> slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
> going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
> both on the same bullet point?
Sure, reword it however you want. I've not been paying much attention
to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.
regards, tom lane
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:11:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. > >> > >> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something* > >> here. > > > We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is. > > But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from > > slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really > > going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them > > both on the same bullet point? > > Sure, reword it however you want. I've not been paying much attention > to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there. FYI, I didn't get involved in making the 9.2 major features list because I felt I already had a heavy hand in creating the original 9.2 release notes. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. >>> >>> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something* >>> here. > >> We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is. >> But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from >> slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really >> going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them >> both on the same bullet point? > > Sure, reword it however you want. I've not been paying much attention > to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there. Done. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/