Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Date
Msg-id 20120903165752.GH24132@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep  3, 2012 at 12:11:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
> >> 
> >> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
> >> here.
> 
> > We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
> > But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
> > slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
> > going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
> > both on the same bullet point?
> 
> Sure, reword it however you want.  I've not been paying much attention
> to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.

FYI, I didn't get involved in making the 9.2 major features list because
I felt I already had a heavy hand in creating the original 9.2 release
notes.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows