Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Date
Msg-id 2324.1346691528@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's "make check" to 
> succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.

> However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of 
> forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a significant blocker, so 
> I'm going to go and fix that and then pull this all together.

My intentions over the next hour or two are to commit the
unix-socket-directory fix and then sync 9.2 pg_upgrade with HEAD
(ie, back-patch everything that's in HEAD except the int64-XLogRecPtr
changes).  Will that cause any problems for what you're doing?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol