Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Date
Msg-id 5044ED25.6040300@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/03/2012 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's "make check" to
>> succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.
>> However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of
>> forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a significant blocker, so
>> I'm going to go and fix that and then pull this all together.
> My intentions over the next hour or two are to commit the
> unix-socket-directory fix and then sync 9.2 pg_upgrade with HEAD
> (ie, back-patch everything that's in HEAD except the int64-XLogRecPtr
> changes).  Will that cause any problems for what you're doing?
>
>             

No, go for it. I can sync up without difficulty. Does that include 
backpatching the exec_prog changes to 9.2?

cheers

andrew





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Cascading replication and recovery_target_timeline='latest'
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows