Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Date
Msg-id 3339.1346694598@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 09/03/2012 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> My intentions over the next hour or two are to commit the
>> unix-socket-directory fix and then sync 9.2 pg_upgrade with HEAD
>> (ie, back-patch everything that's in HEAD except the int64-XLogRecPtr
>> changes).  Will that cause any problems for what you're doing?

> No, go for it. I can sync up without difficulty. Does that include 
> backpatching the exec_prog changes to 9.2?

Yes, nobody objected, so I'll do that too.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: pg_upgrade del/rmdir path fix