Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Date
Msg-id CABUevEwCnGnGQHGcXgNJe96tcG4NvF7VtLAhLutD2GAgrw+SFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
>
> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
> here.

(yes, i've been backlogged)

We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
both on the same bullet point?

-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this non-volatile pointer access OK?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.