Thread: 7.4 feature freeze is here
The Postgres core committee would like to announce that we are now in feature-freeze mode for the 7.4 release. All patches already received in pgsql-patches will be considered in the usual fashion (and yes, we'll allow some slack for fixing problems in them). New features arriving in the future will be held for 7.5. Feel free to keep sending patches that fix bugs or improve documentation; only new features are out. The plan is to spend the next two weeks cleaning things up (bug fixes, documentation, etc) with a formal beta release scheduled on or about July 15. Final release of 7.4 will be whenever it seems ready, as usual. regards, tom lane
Once you folks are done going through the remaining list of patches, can we get someone to send a rough list of new features in 7.4 sent over to -advocacy? Please feel free to highlight any items that you think warrant special notice from a technical standpoint. Thanks in advance, Robert Treat On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 17:26, Tom Lane wrote: > The Postgres core committee would like to announce that we are now in > feature-freeze mode for the 7.4 release. > > All patches already received in pgsql-patches will be considered in the > usual fashion (and yes, we'll allow some slack for fixing problems in > them). New features arriving in the future will be held for 7.5. > > Feel free to keep sending patches that fix bugs or improve > documentation; only new features are out. > > The plan is to spend the next two weeks cleaning things up (bug fixes, > documentation, etc) with a formal beta release scheduled on or about > July 15. > > Final release of 7.4 will be whenever it seems ready, as usual. > > regards, tom lane > -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:18:23 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote: > > It might be killer than that PHP support for Apache2 requires that all PHP > modules be thread-safe... Is that true if you are using the prefork MPM?
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:18:23 +0800, > Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote: > > > > It might be killer than that PHP support for Apache2 requires that all PHP > > modules be thread-safe... > > Is that true if you are using the prefork MPM? Dunno. Chris
Folks, > > You might like to mention that (as far as I can tell) ECPG is now safe > > for pthreads on Linux and FreeBSD. The recursive mutex locks are removed, > > so > > even > > > platforms that implement the earlier version of pthreads ought to work as > > well, once configure supports them (anyone care to actually test this > > assertion?) I don't quite understand this. This doesn't mean that *postgresql* is threaded, does it? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 04:03 pm, Josh Berkus wrote: > I don't quite understand this. This doesn't mean that *postgresql* is > threaded, does it? I was just referring to the client interfaces ECPG and libpq. AFAIK the back-end is not threaded (and I'm beginning to understand why not). So my app starts multiple threads of execution through the ECPG libs... the ECPG libs (and libpq) start multiple sockets to the back-end - one for each thread. No changes to the back-end. That's my understanding - Lee did most of the work, so maybe he can confirm that. Regards, Philip Yarra.