Thread: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?
Stefan, all: Does anyone have HTML for the 9.1 features? Or do I need to hack something together in a hurry? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 9/8/11 5:30 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Stefan, all: > > Does anyone have HTML for the 9.1 features? Or do I need to hack > something together in a hurry? Actually, I'm not sure I *can* edit this. I don't seem to have permission. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue sep 08 21:41:28 -0300 2011: > On 9/8/11 5:30 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Stefan, all: > > > > Does anyone have HTML for the 9.1 features? Or do I need to hack > > something together in a hurry? > > Actually, I'm not sure I *can* edit this. I don't seem to have permission. Isn't this database-backed? AFAIR you need to login to the admin page on wwwmaster. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
> Isn't this database-backed? AFAIR you need to login to the admin page > on wwwmaster. It is, but it's not accessed through the admin page. Instead, you need to have the right community login on www.postgresql.org. Not sure how that's supposed to work, exactly. Or even if it does. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue sep 08 22:38:10 -0300 2011: > > > Isn't this database-backed? AFAIR you need to login to the admin page > > on wwwmaster. > > It is, but it's not accessed through the admin page. Instead, you need > to have the right community login on www.postgresql.org. Not sure how > that's supposed to work, exactly. Or even if it does. Ah, right, it's not in wwwmaster. You'd have to ping Stefan, I guess. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
On 09/09/2011 05:43 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue sep 08 22:38:10 -0300 2011: >> >>> Isn't this database-backed? AFAIR you need to login to the admin page >>> on wwwmaster. >> >> It is, but it's not accessed through the admin page. Instead, you need >> to have the right community login on www.postgresql.org. Not sure how >> that's supposed to work, exactly. Or even if it does. > > Ah, right, it's not in wwwmaster. You'd have to ping Stefan, I guess. I'm not really sure what the question here is - but Thom did some work on updating the featurematrix for 9.1, it has just not been turned "live" yet. Stefan
On 9/9/11 1:18 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > On 09/09/2011 05:43 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue sep 08 22:38:10 -0300 2011: >>> >>>> Isn't this database-backed? AFAIR you need to login to the admin page >>>> on wwwmaster. >>> >>> It is, but it's not accessed through the admin page. Instead, you need >>> to have the right community login on www.postgresql.org. Not sure how >>> that's supposed to work, exactly. Or even if it does. >> >> Ah, right, it's not in wwwmaster. You'd have to ping Stefan, I guess. > > I'm not really sure what the question here is - but Thom did some work > on updating the featurematrix for 9.1, it has just not been turned > "live" yet. So the data is in there? Great. I had no way to check. Does Devrim know how to turn it live? If not, can you do so this weekend please? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 9 September 2011 18:11, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 9/9/11 1:18 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> On 09/09/2011 05:43 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue sep 08 22:38:10 -0300 2011: >>>> >>>>> Isn't this database-backed? AFAIR you need to login to the admin page >>>>> on wwwmaster. >>>> >>>> It is, but it's not accessed through the admin page. Instead, you need >>>> to have the right community login on www.postgresql.org. Not sure how >>>> that's supposed to work, exactly. Or even if it does. >>> >>> Ah, right, it's not in wwwmaster. You'd have to ping Stefan, I guess. >> >> I'm not really sure what the question here is - but Thom did some work >> on updating the featurematrix for 9.1, it has just not been turned >> "live" yet. > > So the data is in there? Great. I had no way to check. > > Does Devrim know how to turn it live? If not, can you do so this > weekend please? Actually could it be put live today? I'd like people to see if anything's been missed. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On 09/09/2011 07:13 PM, Thom Brown wrote: > On 9 September 2011 18:11, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> On 9/9/11 1:18 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>> On 09/09/2011 05:43 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue sep 08 22:38:10 -0300 2011: >>>>> >>>>>> Isn't this database-backed? AFAIR you need to login to the admin page >>>>>> on wwwmaster. >>>>> >>>>> It is, but it's not accessed through the admin page. Instead, you need >>>>> to have the right community login on www.postgresql.org. Not sure how >>>>> that's supposed to work, exactly. Or even if it does. >>>> >>>> Ah, right, it's not in wwwmaster. You'd have to ping Stefan, I guess. >>> >>> I'm not really sure what the question here is - but Thom did some work >>> on updating the featurematrix for 9.1, it has just not been turned >>> "live" yet. >> >> So the data is in there? Great. I had no way to check. >> >> Does Devrim know how to turn it live? If not, can you do so this >> weekend please? > > Actually could it be put live today? I'd like people to see if > anything's been missed. it is live now - will start showing up on the site soon. Stefan
On 9 September 2011 18:27, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > On 09/09/2011 07:13 PM, Thom Brown wrote: >> On 9 September 2011 18:11, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> On 9/9/11 1:18 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>>> On 09/09/2011 05:43 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>>>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue sep 08 22:38:10 -0300 2011: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Isn't this database-backed? AFAIR you need to login to the admin page >>>>>>> on wwwmaster. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is, but it's not accessed through the admin page. Instead, you need >>>>>> to have the right community login on www.postgresql.org. Not sure how >>>>>> that's supposed to work, exactly. Or even if it does. >>>>> >>>>> Ah, right, it's not in wwwmaster. You'd have to ping Stefan, I guess. >>>> >>>> I'm not really sure what the question here is - but Thom did some work >>>> on updating the featurematrix for 9.1, it has just not been turned >>>> "live" yet. >>> >>> So the data is in there? Great. I had no way to check. >>> >>> Does Devrim know how to turn it live? If not, can you do so this >>> weekend please? >> >> Actually could it be put live today? I'd like people to see if >> anything's been missed. > > it is live now - will start showing up on the site soon. Thanks Stefan :) -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Nothing jumps out at me as missing. Do we still want to continue listing 7.4 at this point? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Nothing jumps out at me as missing. > > Do we still want to continue listing 7.4 at this point? > shouldn't we just show supported releases? -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
On 09/09/2011 08:17 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Nothing jumps out at me as missing. >> >> Do we still want to continue listing 7.4 at this point? >> > > shouldn't we just show supported releases? there is a point to that - on the other side the featurematrix is a nice way to show how steady and strongly we are evolving and innovating. maybe it would make sense to mark the "supported" releases somehow, like buy using a different color or a simple "* support release"? Stefan
On 9 September 2011 19:19, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > On 09/09/2011 08:17 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> Nothing jumps out at me as missing. >>> >>> Do we still want to continue listing 7.4 at this point? >>> >> >> shouldn't we just show supported releases? > > there is a point to that - on the other side the featurematrix is a nice > way to show how steady and strongly we are evolving and innovating. > maybe it would make sense to mark the "supported" releases somehow, like > buy using a different color or a simple "* support release"? I have noticed a mistake I've made. auth_delay, although it's a security feature, shouldn't be under security. It should be listed as contrib/auth_delay under contrib modules. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of vie sep 09 15:02:08 -0300 2011: > Nothing jumps out at me as missing. Security labels? It lists contrib/sepgsql but somehow that doesn't seem to have the same buzzwordy weight to it. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie sep 09 15:29:59 -0300 2011: > Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of vie sep 09 15:02:08 -0300 2011: > > Nothing jumps out at me as missing. > > Security labels? It lists contrib/sepgsql but somehow that doesn't seem > to have the same buzzwordy weight to it. Someone should probably fix this as well: http://www.postgresql.org/about/featuredetail/feature.189 -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
On 9/9/11 11:32 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie sep 09 15:29:59 -0300 2011: >> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of vie sep 09 15:02:08 -0300 2011: >>> Nothing jumps out at me as missing. >> >> Security labels? It lists contrib/sepgsql but somehow that doesn't seem >> to have the same buzzwordy weight to it. > > Someone should probably fix this as well: > http://www.postgresql.org/about/featuredetail/feature.189 Why? Clearly it's explaining our new support for nested escaping. ;-) -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 9 September 2011 19:32, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie sep 09 15:29:59 -0300 2011: >> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of vie sep 09 15:02:08 -0300 2011: >> > Nothing jumps out at me as missing. >> >> Security labels? It lists contrib/sepgsql but somehow that doesn't seem >> to have the same buzzwordy weight to it. > > Someone should probably fix this as well: > http://www.postgresql.org/about/featuredetail/feature.189 Good spot. There were actually 3 instances of this ridiculously excessive escaping. It's a bug in the feature matrix editor. Every time the form is saved, the number of escapes doubles. Looks like you can't use double or single quotes at all, so I've re-jiggered these 3 entries. Will sync to live within the hour. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On 10 September 2011 00:27, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 9 September 2011 19:32, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie sep 09 15:29:59 -0300 2011: >>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of vie sep 09 15:02:08 -0300 2011: >>> > Nothing jumps out at me as missing. >>> >>> Security labels? It lists contrib/sepgsql but somehow that doesn't seem >>> to have the same buzzwordy weight to it. >> >> Someone should probably fix this as well: >> http://www.postgresql.org/about/featuredetail/feature.189 > > Good spot. There were actually 3 instances of this ridiculously > excessive escaping. It's a bug in the feature matrix editor. Every > time the form is saved, the number of escapes doubles. Looks like you > can't use double or single quotes at all, so I've re-jiggered these 3 > entries. Will sync to live within the hour. Okay, obviously not synced, only on wwwmaster. Can someone press the big manual sync button? -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company