Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?
Date
Msg-id CAA-aLv4TeXRse5-vZYRiFvR1f-yHv0rnOCBn3NjU7ePhVYv6UQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 9 September 2011 19:19, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 08:17 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>> Nothing jumps out at me as missing.
>>>
>>> Do we still want to continue listing 7.4 at this point?
>>>
>>
>> shouldn't we just show supported releases?
>
> there is a point to that - on the other side the featurematrix is a nice
> way to show how steady and strongly we are evolving and innovating.
> maybe it would make sense to mark the "supported" releases somehow, like
> buy using a different color or a simple "* support release"?

I have noticed a mistake I've made.  auth_delay, although it's a
security feature, shouldn't be under security. It should be listed as
contrib/auth_delay under contrib modules.

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?