Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

12 April 2011

• 00:06   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. mark
• 00:18   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Scott Marlowe
• 00:19   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Scott Marlowe
• 00:51   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. mark
• 01:59   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Merlin Moncure
• 02:12   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Scott Marlowe
• 05:18   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Jesper Krogh
• 05:28   performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used? Dieter Rehbein
• 05:55   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Scott Marlowe
• 06:49   Poor performance when joining against inherited tables Lucas Madar
• 07:31   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Arjen van der Meijden
• 07:33   Re: Slow query postgres 8.3 Claudio Freire
• 07:42   Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used? Claudio Freire
• 07:51   DBT-5 & Postgres 9.0.3 Sethu Prasad
• 08:55   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Glyn Astill
• 08:57   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Glyn Astill
• 08:59   Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used? Dieter Rehbein
• 09:07   Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used? Claudio Freire
• 09:33   Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used? tv@fuzzy.cz
• 09:36   Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used? Dieter Rehbein
• 12:35   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Glyn Astill
• 13:22   Re: Poor performance when joining against inherited tables Shaun Thomas
• 13:23   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Merlin Moncure
• 13:24   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Merlin Moncure
• 14:33   Re: Two servers - One Replicated - Same query Kevin Grittner
• 14:38   Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used? Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Kevin Grittner
• 16:01   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Glyn Astill
• 16:07   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Glyn Astill
• 16:12   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Merlin Moncure
• 16:36   Performance Ogden
• 16:40   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Kevin Grittner
• 16:44   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Claudio Freire
• 16:59   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. F. BROUARD / SQLpro
• 17:01   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Greg Smith
• 17:10   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Greg Smith
• 17:14   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Merlin Moncure
• 17:19   Re: Performance Andreas Kretschmer
• 17:23   Re: Performance Ogden
• 18:25   Re: Performance Tomas Vondra
• 18:34   Re: Performance Ogden
• 19:26   Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. Strange, John W
• 21:10   Re: Performance Tomas Vondra
• 21:21   Re: Performance Ogden
• 22:37   Re: Performance Tomas Vondra
• 23:31   poor execution plan because column dependence Václav Ovsík