Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

25 March 2010

• 00:47   Re: Forcing index scan on query produces 16x faster Robert Haas
• 00:51   memory question Campbell, Lance
• 01:17   Re: Forcing index scan on query produces 16x faster Eger, Patrick
• 02:06   Re: memory question Scott Marlowe
• 02:17   Re: Forcing index scan on query produces 16x faster Robert Haas
• 06:28   Re: memory question Dave Crooke
• 10:35   Re: memory question Matthew Wakeling
• 15:01   Why Wal_buffer is 64KB Tadipathri Raghu
• 15:44   Re: default_statistics_target Robert Haas
• 16:06   Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB Brad Nicholson
• 17:16   Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB Jaime Casanova
• 18:20   Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB Pierre C
• 18:53   tuning auto vacuum for highly active tables Bhella Paramjeet-PFCW67
• 18:54   Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions Hannu Krosing
• 20:14   Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions James Mansion
• 20:24   Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions Scott Marlowe
• 20:35   Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions Pierre C
• 20:38   Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions Scott Marlowe
• 21:25   Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions Yeb Havinga
• 21:28   experiments in query optimization Faheem Mitha