Why Wal_buffer is 64KB - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tadipathri Raghu
Subject Why Wal_buffer is 64KB
Date
Msg-id 645d9d71003250801o246439a0j93c7b568786e98de@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB  (Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>)
Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi All,
 
Can anybody clarify on this, why wal_buffer is 64kb and what is advantages and disadvantages in increasing or decreasing the wal_buffer.
 
Regards
Raghav

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Wakeling
Date:
Subject: Re: memory question
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: default_statistics_target