Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Brad Nicholson
Subject Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB
Date
Msg-id 1269533147.5155.41.camel@bnicholson-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why Wal_buffer is 64KB  (Tadipathri Raghu <traghu.dba@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 20:31 +0530, Tadipathri Raghu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anybody clarify on this, why wal_buffer is 64kb and what is
> advantages and disadvantages in increasing or decreasing the
> wal_buffer.

This is addressed in the documentation.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/wal-configuration.html

--
Brad Nicholson  416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: default_statistics_target
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB