Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

29 August 2018

• 00:47   Re: pg_dump test instability Tom Lane
• 00:54   Re: csv format for psql Fabien COELHO
• 01:11   Re: More parallel pg_dump bogosities Tom Lane
• 01:30   Re: Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?) Andrey Borodin
• 01:30   Re: More parallel pg_dump bogosities Alvaro Herrera
• 01:34   Re: Catalog corruption Asim R P
• 01:53   pg_dump --load-via-partition-root vs. parallel restore Tom Lane
• 02:01   Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? Andrey Borodin
• 02:07   Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? Stephen Frost
• 02:34   Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? Andrey Borodin
• 02:41   Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? Stephen Frost
• 02:46   Re: Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding? Jeremy Finzel
• 03:04   Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? Andrey Borodin
• 03:12   some pg_dump query code simplification Peter Eisentraut
• 03:15   Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? David Steele
• 03:20   Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? Stephen Frost
• 03:43   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? Michael Paquier
• 03:49   Re: Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding? Tomas Vondra
• 03:56   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Stephen Frost
• 04:01   Re: Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding? Tomas Vondra
• 04:05   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Tom Lane
• 04:10   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Stephen Frost
• 04:22   Re: More parallel pg_dump bogosities Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Tom Lane
• 04:28   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Stephen Frost
• 05:03   Re: Why hash OIDs? Thomas Munro
• 05:05   Re: Why hash OIDs? Thomas Munro
• 05:24   Re: Postmaster doesn't send SIGTERM to bgworker during fast shutdownwhen pmState == PM_STARTUP Michael Paquier
• 05:45   Re: Why hash OIDs? Thomas Munro
• 06:02   Re: Why hash OIDs? Tom Lane
• 06:17   Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 06:39   Re: Copy function for logical replication slots Masahiko Sawada
• 07:34   Re: BUG #15182: Canceling authentication due to timeout aka Denialof Service Attack Michael Paquier
• 08:04   Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 08:56   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662":read only 0 of 8192 bytes Andres Freund
• 09:13   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662":read only 0 of 8192 bytes Andres Freund
• 09:18   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
• 09:27   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662":read only 0 of 8192 bytes Andres Freund
• 09:29   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662":read only 0 of 8192 bytes Andres Freund
• 09:32   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
• 09:51   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662":read only 0 of 8192 bytes Andres Freund
• 10:50   Re: Refactor textToQualifiedNameList() Yugo Nagata
• 12:32   Re: "Write amplification" is made worse by "getting tired" whileinserting into nbtree secondary indexes (Was: Why B-Tree suffix truncationmatters) Peter Eisentraut
• 13:09   Re: Postmaster doesn't send SIGTERM to bgworker during fast shutdownwhen pmState == PM_STARTUP Alexander Kukushkin
• 13:28   Re: Catalog corruption Mariel Cherkassky
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join Ashutosh Bapat
• 14:26   Re: logical decoding: ABI break in 10.5 et al Christoph Berg
• 14:28   Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -roption) Daniel Gustafsson
• 14:32   A strange GiST error message or fillfactor of GiST build Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:37   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662":read only 0 of 8192 bytes Andres Freund
• 14:38   Re: Flexible configuration for full-text search Aleksandr Parfenov
• 15:01   Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP Alexander Korotkov
• 15:09   Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes Amit Kapila
• 15:25   Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes Yugo Nagata
• 15:37   PL/Python: Remove use of simple slicing API Peter Eisentraut
• 15:40   Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled. Etsuro Fujita
• 16:00   Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes Yugo Nagata
• 16:09   Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes Dilip Kumar
• 16:13   Use C99 designated initializers for some structs Peter Eisentraut
• 16:14   Re: Use C99 designated initializers for some structs Peter Eisentraut
• 16:18   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Vladimir Sitnikov
• 16:31   Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes Amit Kapila
• 16:34   Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes Dilip Kumar
• 17:10   Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes Yugo Nagata
• 17:31   Re: Catalog corruption Andrew Gierth
• 17:31   pg_verify_checksums vs windows Amit Kapila
• 17:33   Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -roption) Yugo Nagata
• 17:35   Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows Magnus Hagander
• 17:37   Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -roption) Michael Banck
• 17:38   Re: Two proposed modifications to the PostgreSQL FDW Etsuro Fujita
• 17:44   Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows Amit Kapila
• 17:46   Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option) Magnus Hagander
• 17:47   Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows Magnus Hagander
• 18:06   speeding up planning with partitions Amit Langote
• 18:09   Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -roption) Yugo Nagata
• 18:46   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Andrew Dunstan
• 18:51   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Andrew Dunstan
• 19:08   Re: some more error location support Peter Eisentraut
• 19:11   Re: some more error location support Peter Eisentraut
• 19:24   Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench Peter Eisentraut
• 19:27   Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API Peter Eisentraut
• 19:42   Re: A strange GiST error message or fillfactor of GiST build Andrey Borodin
• 20:01   10.5 but not 10.4: backend startup during reindex system: could notread block 0 in file "base/16400/..": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Justin Pryzby
• 20:04   Is child process of postmaster able to access all the databases? Hubert Zhang
• 20:25   Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -roption) Yugo Nagata
• 20:35   Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench Fabien COELHO
• 20:39   Re: some more error location support Fabien COELHO
• 20:41   Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench Chapman Flack
• 20:45   Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench Alvaro Herrera
• 20:54   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Peter Eisentraut
• 21:30   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
• 21:33   Re: Is child process of postmaster able to access all the databases? Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: 10.5 but not 10.4: backend startup during reindex system: could not read block 0 in file "base/16400/..": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
• 21:43   rare crash - FailedAssertion snapbuild.c Line: 580 Erik Rijkers
• 21:43   Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API Sergei Kornilov
• 21:59   Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: some pg_dump query code simplification Tom Lane
• 22:38   Re: Something's busted in plpgsql composite-variable handling Jonathan S. Katz
• 22:56   Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes Tom Lane
• 23:38   Re: FailedAssertion on partprune Robert Haas
• 23:45   Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench Fabien COELHO