Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Ki9+OpHbYXgxZM6X7BEQga_AZsEXp6odLDhODQ-NTkvw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:05 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> So, I think we need to open the file in binary mode as in other parts
>> of the code.  The attached patch fixes the problem for me.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>
> Yikes. Yes, I believe you are correct, and that looks like the correct fix.
>
> I wonder why this was not caught on the buildfarm. We do have regression tests for it, AFAIK?
>

I am not able to find regression tests for it, but maybe I am not
seeing it properly.  By any chance, you have removed it during revert
of ""Allow on-line enabling and disabling of data checksums".

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Two proposed modifications to the PostgreSQL FDW
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)