Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyTqbnCji2XvMfg2Bi1B-AN95R2qPeQd23Rc4QQ=Cxq6Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:05 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> So, I think we need to open the file in binary mode as in other parts
>> of the code.  The attached patch fixes the problem for me.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>
> Yikes. Yes, I believe you are correct, and that looks like the correct fix.
>
> I wonder why this was not caught on the buildfarm. We do have regression tests for it, AFAIK?
>

I am not able to find regression tests for it, but maybe I am not
seeing it properly.  By any chance, you have removed it during revert
of ""Allow on-line enabling and disabling of data checksums".


Oh meh. You are right, it's in the reverted patch, I was looking in the wrong branch :/ Sorry about that. And that certainly explains why we don't have it. 

--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: speeding up planning with partitions