Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Date
Msg-id 32048.1535575129@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662":read only 0 of 8192 bytes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-08-29 12:56:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, I now have a theory for why we suddenly started seeing this problem
>> in mid-June: commits a54e1f158 et al added a ScanPgRelation call where
>> there had been none before (in RelationReloadNailed, for non-index rels).
>> That didn't create the problem, but it probably increased the odds of
>> seeing it happen.

> Yea.  Doesn't explain why it's only really visible on the BF in
> 11/master though :/

Probably we changed around the tests that run in parallel with vacuum.sql
enough during v11 to make it happen with noticeable probability.  I think
this is sufficient evidence that it's happening now in the back branches:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180829140149.GO23024@telsasoft.com

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662":read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes