On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:01:53 +0530
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > By the way, I think we can fix this also by clearing the header information of the last
> > page instead of setting a checksum to the unused page although I am not sure which way
> > is better.
> >
>
> I think that can complicate the WAL logging of this operation which we
> are able to deal easily with log_newpage and it sounds quite hacky.
> The fix I have posted seems better, but I am open to suggestions.
Thank you for your explanation. I understood this way could make the
codes complicated, so I think the way you posted is better.
Regards,
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
