Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

22 April 2017

• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 00:45   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking forwalsenders Andres Freund
• 01:20   Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password Michael Paquier
• 01:22   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables Robert Haas
• 01:23   Re: [HACKERS] Why is get_cheapest_parallel_safe_total_inner() in pathkeys.c? Robert Haas
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table Robert Haas
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Tom Lane
• 04:14   Re: [HACKERS] multithreading in Batch/pipelining mode for libpq Craig Ringer
• 04:21   Re: [HACKERS] multithreading in Batch/pipelining mode for libpq Andres Freund
• 04:22   Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More Craig Ringer
• 06:50   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Tom Lane
• 07:58   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results intovariables Fabien COELHO
• 08:34   Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes Andres Freund
• 08:36   Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes Andres Freund
• 08:45   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Thomas Munro
• 08:54   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Andres Freund
• 11:08   Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS Dean Rasheed
• 12:13   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Simon Riggs
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS Simon Riggs
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS Pavel Stehule
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS David Rowley
• 16:54   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Thomas Munro
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing Pierre Ducroquet
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] multithreading in Batch/pipelining mode for libpq Greg Stark
• 17:29   Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More Andrew Dunstan
• 17:31   Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing Michael Paquier
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 18:51   Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker Masahiko Sawada
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism Petr Jelinek
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 19:27   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 19:37   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing Pierre Ducroquet
• 20:51   [HACKERS] A note about debugging TAP failures Tom Lane
• 20:58   Re: [HACKERS] Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL Sandeep Thakkar
• 21:31   [HACKERS] valgrind error in subscription code Andres Freund
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] valgrind error in subscription code Petr Jelinek
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] valgrind error in subscription code Andres Freund
• 22:38   Re: [HACKERS] A note about debugging TAP failures Fabien COELHO
• 22:45   Re: [HACKERS] A note about debugging TAP failures Andres Freund
• 23:09   Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on? Petr Jelinek
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table Noah Misch
• 23:19   [HACKERS] PostgresNode::append_conf considered dangerous Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: [HACKERS] A note about debugging TAP failures Tom Lane
• 23:43   [HACKERS] recovery tests vs windows Andrew Dunstan