Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

22 April 2017

• 00:08   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Tom Lane
• 00:21   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Andres Freund
• 00:40   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Andres Freund
• 00:47   [HACKERS] Missing feature in Phrase Search? Josh Berkus
• 00:49   Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More Andrew Dunstan
• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Tom Lane
• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Alvaro Herrera
• 01:26   Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code Fujii Masao
• 01:55   Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More Peter Eisentraut
• 01:55   Re: [HACKERS] On-disk format of SCRAM verifiers Heikki Linnakangas
• 02:04   Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password Heikki Linnakangas
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Tom Lane
• 02:21   Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More Tom Lane
• 02:31   [HACKERS] multithreading in Batch/pipelining mode for libpq Ilya Roublev
• 03:04   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking forwalsenders Andres Freund
• 04:20   Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password Michael Paquier
• 04:22   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables Robert Haas
• 04:23   Re: [HACKERS] Why is get_cheapest_parallel_safe_total_inner() in pathkeys.c? Robert Haas
• 04:28   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table Robert Haas
• 04:28   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Tom Lane
• 07:14   Re: [HACKERS] multithreading in Batch/pipelining mode for libpq Craig Ringer
• 07:21   Re: [HACKERS] multithreading in Batch/pipelining mode for libpq Andres Freund
• 07:22   Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More Craig Ringer
• 09:50   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Tom Lane
• 10:58   Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results intovariables Fabien COELHO
• 11:34   Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes Andres Freund
• 11:36   Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes Andres Freund
• 11:45   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Thomas Munro
• 11:54   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start Andres Freund
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS Dean Rasheed
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Simon Riggs
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS Simon Riggs
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS Pavel Stehule
• 16:39   Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS David Rowley
• 19:54   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Thomas Munro
• 20:12   Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing Pierre Ducroquet
• 20:12   Re: [HACKERS] multithreading in Batch/pipelining mode for libpq Greg Stark
• 20:29   Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More Andrew Dunstan
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing Michael Paquier
• 21:41   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 21:51   Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker Masahiko Sawada
• 21:53   Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism Petr Jelinek
• 21:59   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 22:27   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 22:37   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders Tom Lane
• 22:46   Re: [HACKERS] Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing Pierre Ducroquet
• 23:51   [HACKERS] A note about debugging TAP failures Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: [HACKERS] Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL Sandeep Thakkar