Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders
Date
Msg-id 8872.1492876777@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Whoa.  This just turned into a much larger can of worms than I expected.
> How can it be that processes are getting assertion crashes and yet the
> test framework reports success anyway?  That's impossibly
> broken/unacceptable.

Taking a quick census of other buildfarm machines that are known to be
running the recovery test, it appears that most (not all) are seeing
one or both traps.  But the test is reporting success anyway, everywhere
except on Noah's 32-bit AIX critters.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders