Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

19 April 2017

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Fujii Masao
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries Maksim Milyutin
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher setapplication_name? Petr Jelinek
• 01:54   Re: [HACKERS] Quals not pushed down into lateral David Fetter
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans Tom Lane
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] Passing values to a dynamic background worker Keith Fiske
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki Fabien COELHO
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] Continuous buildfarm failures on hamster with bin-check Michael Paquier
• 06:39   [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery Douglas Doole
• 07:48   Re: [HACKERS] Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code Jeff Janes
• 08:09   Re: [HACKERS] Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code Jeff Janes
• 08:13   Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on? Petr Jelinek
• 08:18   Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code Petr Jelinek
• 08:25   [HACKERS] Use sync commit for logical replication apply in TAP tests Petr Jelinek
• 08:29   Re: [HACKERS] Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code Michael Paquier
• 08:39   Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() David Rowley
• 09:26   Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans Amit Kapila
• 09:31   Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() Tom Lane
• 09:34   Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Noah Misch
• 09:36   Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() David Rowley
• 09:39   Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans Tom Lane
• 09:43   [HACKERS] Fixup some misusage of appendStringInfo and friends David Rowley
• 10:32   Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() Michael Paquier
• 10:52   Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada
• 11:19   [HACKERS] Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE Pavan Deolasee
• 11:45   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Michael Paquier
• 11:48   Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Michael Paquier
• 11:49   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE Andrew Gierth
• 11:51   Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE Pavan Deolasee
• 12:15   Re: [HACKERS] Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki Jan Michálek
• 12:19   Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Amit Kapila
• 13:18   Re: [HACKERS] Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki Fabien COELHO
• 14:05   Re: [HACKERS] Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki Jan Michálek
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:25   Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() becomepg_current_wal_lsn() Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code Petr Jelinek
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table Ashutosh Bapat
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery Ashutosh Bapat
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code Petr Jelinek
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table Maksim Milyutin
• 15:37   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication ApplyContext bloat Petr Jelinek
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication ApplyContext bloat Stas Kelvich
• 16:24   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication ApplyContext bloat Petr Jelinek
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication ApplyContext bloat Simon Riggs
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication ApplyContext bloat Stas Kelvich
• 17:30   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication ApplyContext bloat Petr Jelinek
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker Masahiko Sawada
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] Fixup some misusage of appendStringInfo and friends Ashutosh Bapat
• 18:55   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication ApplyContext bloat Stas Kelvich
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker Petr Jelinek
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication ApplyContext bloat Alvaro Herrera
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker Masahiko Sawada
• 19:59   [HACKERS] BuildFarm client release 4.19 Andrew Dunstan
• 20:07   Re: [HACKERS] Relation cache invalidation on replica Victor Yegorov
• 20:13   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries Remi Colinet
• 20:15   Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries Remi Colinet
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker Petr Jelinek
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken Andres Freund
• 22:41   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries Maksim Milyutin
• 22:53   [HACKERS] BRIN autosummarize tests Nikolay Shaplov
• 23:21   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery Douglas Doole
• 23:28   [HACKERS] Cost of src/test/recovery and .../subscription tests Tom Lane
• 23:38   Re: [HACKERS] [buildfarm-members] BuildFarm client release 4.19 Tom Lane
• 23:54   Re: [HACKERS] Cost of src/test/recovery and .../subscription tests Andrew Dunstan
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] [buildfarm-members] BuildFarm client release 4.19 Andrew Dunstan