Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 July 2016

• 00:26   [sqlsmith] crashes in RestoreSnapshot on hot standby Andreas Seltenreich
• 00:36   Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels Robert Haas
• 00:54   Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels Tom Lane
• 01:17   Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels Robert Haas
• 01:33   Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels Robert Haas
• 01:46   Re: parallel workers and client encoding Robert Haas
• 01:49   Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion Robert Haas
• 02:14   Re: WIP: About CMake v2 Michael Paquier
• 02:21   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Michael Paquier
• 02:35   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Alvaro Herrera
• 02:41   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Michael Paquier
• 02:49   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Alvaro Herrera
• 02:50   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Michael Paquier
• 03:13   Allow INSTEAD OF DELETE triggers to modify the tuple for RETURNING Marko Tiikkaja
• 03:27   Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more Andreas Karlsson
• 03:33   Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 03:46   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Michael Paquier
• 03:48   Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) Craig Ringer
• 03:57   Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) Alvaro Herrera
• 03:58   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Michael Paquier
• 04:02   Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) Michael Paquier
• 04:14   Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive Peter Geoghegan
• 04:23   Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive Andres Freund
• 04:26   Bad behavior from plpython 'return []' Jim Nasby
• 04:28   Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) Craig Ringer
• 04:34   Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive Peter Geoghegan
• 04:35   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 04:56   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Michael Paquier
• 05:08   Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive Andres Freund
• 05:09   Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more Michael Paquier
• 05:12   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Amit Kapila
• 05:17   Re: [sqlsmith] crashes in RestoreSnapshot on hot standby Michael Paquier
• 05:23   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Tom Lane
• 05:33   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 06:15   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Michael Paquier
• 06:19   Re: [sqlsmith] crashes in RestoreSnapshot on hot standby Thomas Munro
• 06:19   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 06:25   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Michael Paquier
• 06:26   Re: [sqlsmith] crashes in RestoreSnapshot on hot standby Amit Kapila
• 06:51   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Noah Misch
• 07:01   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 07:06   Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) Noah Misch
• 07:08   Re: [sqlsmith] crashes in RestoreSnapshot on hot standby Thomas Munro
• 07:09   Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h Noah Misch
• 07:23   Re: [sqlsmith] crashes in RestoreSnapshot on hot standby Amit Kapila
• 08:03   Re: Forthcoming SQL standards about JSON and Multi-Dimensional Arrays (FYI) Pavel Stehule
• 08:41   Re: [sqlsmith] crashes in RestoreSnapshot on hot standby Andreas Seltenreich
• 09:40   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Craig Ringer
• 09:48   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Andres Freund
• 10:16   Re: Odd system-column handling in postgres_fdw join pushdown patch Etsuro Fujita
• 10:24   Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 11:02   Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more Magnus Hagander
• 11:10   Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more Michael Paquier
• 11:33   Re: WIP: About CMake v2 Yury Zhuravlev
• 12:09   Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more Magnus Hagander
• 12:26   Re: WIP: About CMake v2 Dmitry Maslyuk
• 12:42   Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more Christoph Berg
• 12:53   Re: Forthcoming SQL standards about JSON and Multi-Dimensional Arrays (FYI) Oleg Bartunov
• 14:06   Re: Forthcoming SQL standards about JSON and Multi-Dimensional Arrays (FYI) Craig Ringer
• 14:30   Re: [ADMIN] problems using pg_start_backup/pg_stop_backup and pg_basebackup at same time Magnus Hagander
• 15:17   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Robert Haas
• 16:04   Re: [sqlsmith] crashes in RestoreSnapshot on hot standby Robert Haas
• 16:18   Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h Robert Haas
• 16:23   Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) Robert Haas
• 16:28   Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility Robert Haas
• 16:29   Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h Tom Lane
• 16:30   Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h Michael Paquier
• 16:33   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas
• 16:41   Re: Truncating/vacuuming relations on full tablespaces Robert Haas
• 16:53   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Tom Lane
• 16:53   Re: Actuall row count of Parallel Seq Scan in EXPLAIN ANALYZE . Robert Haas
• 16:56   Re: Comment and function argument names are mismatched in bugmgr.c. Robert Haas
• 16:57   Re: Extract Jsonb key and values Robert Haas
• 16:58   Re: how is the WAL receiver process stopped and restarted when the network connection is broken and then restored? Robert Haas
• 17:00   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Kevin Grittner
• 17:02   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas
• 17:09   Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility Amit Kapila
• 17:11   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Robert Haas
• 17:16   Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Ashutosh Bapat
• 17:20   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Merlin Moncure
• 17:23   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Masahiko Sawada
• 17:52   Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas
• 18:27   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas
• 18:32   Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Robert Haas
• 18:39   Re: ToDo: API for SQL statement execution other than SPI Robert Haas
• 18:54   Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels Robert Haas
• 18:55   Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels Robert Haas
• 19:00   Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility Robert Haas
• 19:01   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Merlin Moncure
• 19:02   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Stephen Frost
• 19:06   Re: Actuall row count of Parallel Seq Scan in EXPLAIN ANALYZE . David G. Johnston
• 19:06   The link to download PostgreSQL 9.6 Beta 2 for Windows X64 is broken (The link downloads Beta 1) Jean-Pierre Pelletier
• 19:07   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas
• 19:12   Re: The link to download PostgreSQL 9.6 Beta 2 for Windows X64 is broken (The link downloads Beta 1) Dave Page
• 19:19   Re: The link to download PostgreSQL 9.6 Beta 2 for Windows X64 is broken (The link downloads Beta 1) Bruce Momjian
• 19:45   Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Alvaro Herrera
• 19:52   Re: ToDo: API for SQL statement execution other than SPI Vibhor Kumar
• 20:15   TLC for EXPLAIN ANALYZE (parallel query and loops) David G. Johnston
• 20:31   Re: Forthcoming SQL standards about JSON and Multi-Dimensional Arrays (FYI) Andres Freund
• 20:56   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Alvaro Herrera
• 21:00   Re: Bad behavior from plpython 'return []' Robert Haas
• 21:01   Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h Tom Lane
• 21:23   Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) Peter Geoghegan
• 21:46   Re: Forthcoming SQL standards about JSON and Multi-Dimensional Arrays (FYI) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:59   Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion Robert Haas
• 22:10   Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) Robert Haas
• 22:14   Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h Tom Lane
• 22:18   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 22:23   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 22:30   Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) Peter Geoghegan
• 22:31   [sqlsmith] ERROR: plan should not reference subplan's variable Andreas Seltenreich
• 22:37   Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) Peter Geoghegan
• 22:52   Re: Bad behavior from plpython 'return []' Tom Lane
• 23:35   Re: Bad behavior from plpython 'return []' Jim Nasby
• 23:42   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Jim Nasby
• 23:43   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 23:49   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Jim Nasby