Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSbeZPWX845k18zWRO-LSCS5+sJvYUmmR2TZ_-ygNDDCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I plan to, once the tree opens again. Likely needs some considerable
> updates for recent changes.

Offhand, do you think that CREATE INDEX calls to smgrextend() could be
appreciably affected by this bottleneck? If that's a very involved or
difficult question, then no need to answer now.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions?