Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Date
Msg-id 20160701012315.7ng4zsnsxcoecuw6@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-06-30 18:14:15 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > Took a while. But here we go. The attached version is a significantly
> > revised version of my earlier patch. Notably I've pretty much entirely
> > revised the code in _mdfd_getseg() to be more similar to the state in
> > master. Also some comment policing.
> 
> Are you planning to pick this up again, Andres?

I plan to, once the tree opens again. Likely needs some considerable
updates for recent changes.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Bad behavior from plpython 'return []'