Craig Ringer wrote: > On 30 June 2016 at 07:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Thanks for investigating! I'll go commit that change. I wish someone > > >> would put up a buildfarm critter using VS2013, though. > > > > > Uh, isn't that what woodlouse is using? > > > > Well, it wasn't reporting this crash, so there's *something* different.
> It may only affect the i386 to x86_64 cross compiler. If Woodlouse is using > native x86_64 compilers perhaps that's why?
Hmm, so what about a pure 32bit build, if such a thing still exists? If so and it causes the same crash, perhaps we should have one member for each VS version running on 32bit x86.
It's fine for a pure 32-bit build, i.e. 32-bit tools and 32-bit target. I tested that.