Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

21 June 2016

• 00:08   Re: 10.0 Robert Haas
• 00:11   Re: 10.0 Robert Haas
• 00:14   Re: 10.0 Merlin Moncure
• 00:23   Re: forcing a rebuild of the visibility map Robert Haas
• 00:24   Re: 10.0 Joshua D. Drake
• 00:36   Re: 10.0 David G. Johnston
• 00:47   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas
• 00:53   Re: 10.0 Robert Haas
• 00:55   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 00:59   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 01:18   Re: 10.0 Bruce Momjian
• 01:20   Re: 10.0 Bruce Momjian
• 01:38   Re: Parallel query and temp_file_limit Peter Geoghegan
• 01:50   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane
• 01:59   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Thomas Munro
• 02:05   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Alvaro Herrera
• 02:47   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David G. Johnston
• 03:26   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Michael Paquier
• 03:58   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:01   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Michael Paquier
• 05:08   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Bruce Momjian
• 05:10   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Bruce Momjian
• 05:18   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane
• 05:29   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Tom Lane
• 05:39   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Michael Paquier
• 05:51   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Tom Lane
• 05:59   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Peter Eisentraut
• 06:01   Re: Parallel query and temp_file_limit Tom Lane
• 06:06   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Tom Lane
• 06:07   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut
• 06:16   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane
• 06:29   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Amit Kapila
• 06:32   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Michael Paquier
• 06:38   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Thomas Munro
• 06:46   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Thomas Munro
• 06:51   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 07:32   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila
• 07:47   Missing checks when malloc returns NULL... Michael Paquier
• 08:00   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Amit Kapila
• 08:07   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Amit Kapila
• 08:28   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Amit Kapila
• 10:27   Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Rushabh Lathia
• 10:50   Re: Declarative partitioning Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:13   Re: Declarative partitioning Amit Langote
• 11:59   Re: 10.0 Cédric Villemain
• 14:06   Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Amit Langote
• 14:43   Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Ashutosh Bapat
• 15:15   Re: Parallel query and temp_file_limit Robert Haas
• 15:20   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas
• 15:30   Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Etsuro Fujita
• 15:41   Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Ashutosh Bapat
• 15:49   Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference Etsuro Fujita
• 15:56   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Craig Ringer
• 16:46   Re: Missing checks when malloc returns NULL... Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: Precedence of new phrase search tsquery operator Teodor Sigaev
• 17:38   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 17:47   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 17:51   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 18:04   Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver Stephen Frost
• 18:17   Re: Choosing the cheapest optimizer cost Robert Haas
• 18:35   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Bruce Momjian
• 18:54   Requesting external_pid_file with postgres -C when not initialized lead to coredump alain radix
• 18:57   Re: Hash Indexes Robert Haas
• 19:03   Re: Hash Indexes Robert Haas
• 19:08   Re: [GENERAL] PgQ and pg_dump Robert Haas
• 19:12   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas
• 19:15   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Bruce Momjian
• 19:15   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Bruce Momjian
• 19:20   Re: Choosing the cheapest optimizer cost Bruce Momjian
• 19:45   Re: [GENERAL] PgQ and pg_dump Martín Marqués
• 19:54   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 19:58   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Robert Haas
• 20:02   Re: Requesting external_pid_file with postgres -C when not initialized lead to coredump Alvaro Herrera
• 20:03   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 20:58   Re: 10.0 José Luis Tallón
• 20:58   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 21:42   Gin index on array of uuid Enrique MailingLists
• 21:51   Re: Gin index on array of uuid Peter Geoghegan
• 22:16   Re: pg_bsd_indent - improvements around offsetof and sizeof Bruce Momjian
• 22:20   Re: Gin index on array of uuid Tom Lane
• 22:22   Re: pg_bsd_indent - improvements around offsetof and sizeof Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: pg_bsd_indent - improvements around offsetof and sizeof Bruce Momjian
• 22:37   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia Robert Haas
• 22:38   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 22:43   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia Tom Lane
• 22:46   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 23:09   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 23:18   EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Merlin Moncure
• 23:32   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 23:35   Re: Rethinking behavior of force_parallel_mode = regress Robert Haas
• 23:41   Re: Rethinking behavior of force_parallel_mode = regress Tom Lane