On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Vik Fearing <vik@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> On 19/06/16 13:02, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Vik Fearing <vik@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
>>> On 19/06/16 12:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Michael Paquier
>>>> Or in short the attached.
>>>
>>> The code looks good to me but why no documentation?
>>
>> Because that's a long day... Thanks! Now you have it.
>
> Thanks, this looks good. Could you please add it to the next commitfest
> so that it doesn't get lost and also so I can do an official review of it?
Yes, I just did that. That's too late for 9.6 anyway with beta2 close by.
--
Michael
