On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I'm also a bit dubious that LockAcquire is safe to call in general
>> with interrupts held.
>
> Looks like we could just acquire the tuple-lock *before* doing the
> toast_insert_or_update/RelationGetBufferForTuple, but after releasing
> the buffer lock. That'd allow us to do avoid doing the nested locking,
> should make the recovery just a goto l2;, ...
Why isn't that racey? Somebody else can grab the tuple lock after we
release the buffer content lock and before we acquire the tuple lock.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
