Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 June 2016

• 00:06   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens David G. Johnston
• 00:30   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens Corey Huinker
• 00:47   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens David Fetter
• 00:58   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Tom Lane
• 01:15   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens David G. Johnston
• 01:20   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens Tom Lane
• 01:48   Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions Andreas Karlsson
• 03:04   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens Peter van Hardenberg
• 03:24   Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods Michael Paquier
• 03:33   Re: Statement timeout Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:47   User demand, and idea, for C-code conversions from JSON arrays to PostgreSQL arrays David G. Johnston
• 03:49   Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names? Michael Paquier
• 03:51   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Peter Eisentraut
• 04:17   Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 04:48   Re: Statement timeout Amit Kapila
• 04:49   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Robert Haas
• 04:57   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Robert Haas
• 05:03   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Tom Lane
• 05:09   Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 Robert Haas
• 05:11   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Robert Haas
• 05:12   Re: Hard to maintain duplication in contain_volatile_functions_not_nextval_walker Robert Haas
• 05:13   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Tom Lane
• 05:15   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Robert Haas
• 05:20   Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 Noah Misch
• 05:22   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Robert Haas
• 05:23   Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 Tom Lane
• 05:26   Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch
• 05:33   Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 Robert Haas
• 05:48   Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 06:48   PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT Michael Paquier
• 07:06   Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT Craig Ringer
• 07:07   Change in order of criteria - reg sri harsha
• 07:15   Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy Craig Ringer
• 07:29   Re: Statement timeout Craig Ringer
• 08:10   Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 08:43   Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy Craig Ringer
• 09:02   Re: foreign table batch inserts Etsuro Fujita
• 09:09   Re: Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 10:51   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Masahiko Sawada
• 12:22   Re: Change in order of criteria - reg Amit Langote
• 13:05   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Amit Kapila
• 14:25   Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods Teodor Sigaev
• 14:30   strange explain in upstream - subplan 1 twice - is it bug? Pavel Stehule
• 15:34   Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names? Masahiko Sawada
• 16:00   Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT Robert Haas
• 16:09   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Robert Haas
• 16:18   Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT David G. Johnston
• 16:20   array of domain types Konstantin Knizhnik
• 16:37   Re: array of domain types Thom Brown
• 16:45   Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy Michael Meskes
• 17:11   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Kevin Grittner
• 17:28   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Tom Lane
• 17:32   Re: Does people favor to have matrix data type? Jim Nasby
• 17:45   Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Jim Nasby
• 17:57   Removing overhead commands in parallel dump/restore Tom Lane
• 17:59   Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions Andreas Karlsson
• 18:03   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens David Fetter
• 18:03   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Paul Ramsey
• 18:05   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Joe Conway
• 18:15   Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions Tom Lane
• 18:27   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Jim Nasby
• 18:45   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Petr Jelinek
• 18:55   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? David G. Johnston
• 18:56   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens Jim Nasby
• 19:00   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Jim Nasby
• 19:07   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens David G. Johnston
• 19:11   Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions Andreas Karlsson
• 19:17   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens David G. Johnston
• 19:24   Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT Alvaro Herrera
• 20:14   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens David Fetter
• 21:00   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Paul Ramsey
• 21:29   Re: Misdesigned command/status APIs for parallel dump/restore Tom Lane
• 21:41   Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens Pavel Stehule
• 21:52   Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types Tom Lane