Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I've largely given up hope of coming up with an alternative that can
> attract more than one vote and that is also at least mildly accurate,
> but one idea is max_parallel_workers_per_gather_node. That will be
> totally clear.
Given the reference to Gather nodes, couldn't you drop the word
"parallel"? "node" might not be necessary either.
regards, tom lane
