On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> contain_volatile_functions_walker is duplicated, near entirely, in
>> contain_volatile_functions_not_nextval_walker.
>
> Previously, I also had same observation.
>
>> Wouldn't it have been better not to duplicate, and keep a flag about
>> ignoring nextval in the context variable?
>
> makes sense. +1 for doing it in the way as you are suggesting.
+1 from me, too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
