Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa2r4gw4Cm3FSn3iwWEpuw9QRtEuz4Om4GXGQGT+EiVUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> The reloption does not set an exact value, according to the code:
>
>> True, max_parallel_degree is an overriding limit.  But the point is
>> that, without the reloption, you can't get lots of workers on a small
>> table.  The reloption lets you do that.
>
> Color me skeptical that that's actually a good idea ...

I'll color you as not having read the threads where multiple users asked for it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794