Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

12 February 2015

• 00:31   Re: reducing our reliance on MD5 Claudio Freire
• 00:37   Re: reducing our reliance on MD5 Claudio Freire
• 00:38   Re: reducing our reliance on MD5 Heikki Linnakangas
• 00:51   Re: reducing our reliance on MD5 Tom Lane
• 00:55   Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE Jim Nasby
• 00:55   Re: relid of non user created tables Jim Nasby
• 01:20   Re: Corner case for add_path_precheck Antonin Houska
• 01:34   Re: Corner case for add_path_precheck Tom Lane
• 01:51   Index-only scans for GiST. Anastasia Lubennikova
• 02:13   Re: Index-only scans for GiST. Thom Brown
• 02:33   Re: SSL renegotiation and other related woes Andres Freund
• 02:42   Re: SSL renegotiation and other related woes Andres Freund
• 03:03   Re: libpq's multi-threaded SSL callback handling is busted Andres Freund
• 03:15   Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication and WAL archive interactions Миша Тюрин
• 03:28   Re: Typo in logicaldecoding.sgml Andres Freund
• 03:48   Re: reducing our reliance on MD5 Stephen Frost
• 04:11   Re: reducing our reliance on MD5 Tom Lane
• 04:58   Re: reducing our reliance on MD5 Stephen Frost
• 05:02   Re: pg_upgrade bug in handling postgres/template1 databases Bruce Momjian
• 06:23   Re: Better error message on pg_upgrade checksum mismatches Bruce Momjian
• 08:06   Re: ExplainModifyTarget doesn't work as expected Etsuro Fujita
• 08:17   Re: assessing parallel-safety Noah Misch
• 10:03   Re: The return value of allocate_recordbuf() Michael Paquier
• 10:26   Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes Michael Paquier
• 11:46   Re: Table-level log_autovacuum_min_duration Naoya Anzai
• 12:22   Re: libpq's multi-threaded SSL callback handling is busted Jan Urbański
• 12:46   Re: libpq's multi-threaded SSL callback handling is busted Andres Freund
• 13:40   Re: Index-only scans for GiST. Anastasia Lubennikova
• 14:08   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Amit Kapila
• 14:08   Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes Syed, Rahila
• 14:26   Re: Table-level log_autovacuum_min_duration Michael Paquier
• 14:28   Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole? Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:40   Re: assessing parallel-safety Amit Kapila
• 15:02   Re: libpq's multi-threaded SSL callback handling is busted Jan Urbański
• 15:30   Re: libpq's multi-threaded SSL callback handling is busted Jan Urbański
• 15:40   Re: assessing parallel-safety Robert Haas
• 16:35   Re: SSL renegotiation and other related woes Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:50   Re: File based Incremental backup v8 Marco Nenciarini
• 16:53   Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory Robert Haas
• 16:55   Logical decoding document Tatsuo Ishii
• 16:56   Re: Standby receiving part of missing WAL segment Robert Haas
• 16:58   Re: Logical decoding document Andres Freund
• 17:23   Re: Simplify sleeping while reading/writing from client Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:31   Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch Marco Nenciarini
• 17:37   Re: Logical decoding document Tatsuo Ishii
• 17:50   Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory Tom Lane
• 17:56   Re: GSoC 2015 - mentors, students and admins. Alexander Korotkov
• 17:57   Re: Standby receiving part of missing WAL segment Thom Brown
• 18:07   Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory Robert Haas
• 18:11   Re: Standby receiving part of missing WAL segment Robert Haas
• 18:38   Re: Index-only scans for GiST. Thom Brown
• 19:37   Re: assessing parallel-safety Robert Haas
• 19:41   Re: Index-only scans for GiST. Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:44   Re: assessing parallel-safety Robert Haas
• 20:08   Re: Index-only scans for GiST. Thom Brown
• 20:15   Re: Index-only scans for GiST. Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 20:48   Re: Getting rid of wal_level=archive and default to hot_standby + wal_senders Peter Eisentraut
• 21:00   Re: binworld and install-binworld targets - was Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand Peter Eisentraut
• 22:11   Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments Sergey Konoplev
• 22:13   Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments Andres Freund
• 22:27   Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm? Heikki Linnakangas
• 22:35   Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments Sergey Konoplev
• 22:40   Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments Andres Freund
• 22:44   Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments Sergey Konoplev
• 23:48   gcc5: initdb produces gigabytes of _fsm files Christoph Berg
• 23:52   Re: assessing parallel-safety Amit Kapila
• 23:58   Re: gcc5: initdb produces gigabytes of _fsm files Tom Lane