Re: Index-only scans for GiST. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Subject Re: Index-only scans for GiST.
Date
Msg-id CAFcNs+rf+UX7SvDs2=shEpQqF0rM2Mt49MrU5r=HjdV=q1hXPA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Index-only scans for GiST.  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Responses Re: Index-only scans for GiST.
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>
> On 12 February 2015 at 16:40, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/12/2015 12:40 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for answer.
>>> Now it seems to be applied correctly.
>>
>>
>> * Documentation is missing.
>
>
> Anastasia provided a documentation patch in the first email.
>

Yeah, but it's a good practice send all the patches together. Will make the life of the reviewers better ;-)

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Index-only scans for GiST.
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting rid of wal_level=archive and default to hot_standby + wal_senders