Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

17 June 2011

• 01:09   Re: Re: patch review : Add ability to constrain backend temporary file space Mark Kirkwood
• 01:10   Re: planinstr, showing planner time on EXPLAIN Hitoshi Harada
• 01:42   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Alvaro Herrera
• 01:51   Re: Re: patch review : Add ability to constrain backend temporary file space Mark Kirkwood
• 01:59   Re: planinstr, showing planner time on EXPLAIN Robert Haas
• 02:10   Re: time-delayed standbys Fujii Masao
• 02:32   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Robert Haas
• 02:34   Re: time-delayed standbys Robert Haas
• 02:38   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Robert Haas
• 03:18   Re: crash-safe visibility map, take five Noah Misch
• 03:45   Re: [GENERAL] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries Robert Haas
• 03:47   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Bruce Momjian
• 03:49   Re: SSI work for 9.1 Robert Haas
• 03:51   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Robert Haas
• 04:07   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Bruce Momjian
• 04:28   Re: SSI work for 9.1 Dan Ports
• 04:32   Re: SSI work for 9.1 Robert Haas
• 04:39   Re: procpid? Greg Smith
• 04:45   Re: SSI work for 9.1 Dan Ports
• 05:40   Re: procpid? Magnus Hagander
• 06:30   Re: Another swing at JSON Bernd Helmle
• 07:54   Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery) Hitoshi Harada
• 07:57   Re: deadlock_timeout at < PGC_SIGHUP? Shigeru Hanada
• 08:33   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 08:46   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Florian Pflug
• 08:47   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 08:55   Re: Nested CASE-WHEN scoping Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:58   Re: Re: patch review : Add ability to constrain backend temporary file space Cédric Villemain
• 09:10   XPATH evaluation Radosław Smogura
• 09:41   Re: XPATH evaluation Florian Pflug
• 10:19   Re: per-column generic option Shigeru Hanada
• 10:33   Re: [BUG] SSPI authentication fails on Windows when server parameter is localhost or domain name Thom Brown
• 10:44   Re: Patch: add GiST support for BOX @> POINT queries Andrew Tipton
• 12:59   Re: per-column generic option David Fetter
• 13:11   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Bruce Momjian
• 13:37   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Alvaro Herrera
• 13:47   Re: XPATH evaluation Andrew Dunstan
• 14:02   Re: Patch: add GiST support for BOX @> POINT queries Tom Lane
• 14:04   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Florian Pflug
• 14:20   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Alvaro Herrera
• 14:23   Re: [GENERAL] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries Thom Brown
• 14:39   Re: [GENERAL] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries David Johnston
• 14:45   Re: [GENERAL] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries Robert Haas
• 14:47   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Andrew Dunstan
• 14:49   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Florian Pflug
• 14:55   Re: XPATH evaluation Radosław Smogura
• 14:57   Re: [v9.2] Start new timeline for PITR Jaime Casanova
• 15:09   Re: XPATH evaluation Andrew Dunstan
• 15:13   Re: XPATH evaluation Radosław Smogura
• 15:15   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:17   Re: XPATH evaluation Florian Pflug
• 15:21   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Florian Pflug
• 15:30   Re: XPATH evaluation Nicolas Barbier
• 15:46   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Alvaro Herrera
• 15:53   Re: XPATH evaluation Radosław Smogura
• 15:54   Re: XPATH evaluation Andrew Dunstan
• 16:00   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Robert Haas
• 16:03   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:13   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Florian Pflug
• 16:29   Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY Florian Pflug
• 16:37   Re: XPATH evaluation Nicolas Barbier
• 17:06   9.1beta2 / UNLOGGED + CHECK + INHERITS Garick Hamlin
• 17:21   Re: crash-safe visibility map, take five Robert Haas
• 17:22   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: 9.1beta2 / UNLOGGED + CHECK + INHERITS Robert Haas
• 18:15   Re: [GENERAL] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries Tom Lane
• 18:24   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Robert Haas
• 18:37   Re: - GSoC - snapshot materialized view (work-in-progress) patch Thom Brown
• 18:40   Re: [GENERAL] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries Robert Haas
• 18:44   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 18:52   Re: [GENERAL] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries Tom Lane
• 18:54   Re: [v9.2] Start new timeline for PITR David Fetter
• 18:56   Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan
• 19:08   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 19:09   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Robert Haas
• 19:15   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Robert Haas
• 19:21   Re: possible connection leak in dblink? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:34   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 19:45   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 20:00   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Robert Haas
• 20:03   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Peter Eisentraut
• 20:05   Re: possible connection leak in dblink? Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Tom Lane
• 20:41   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Alvaro Herrera
• 21:02   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 21:08   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 21:17   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Alvaro Herrera
• 21:25   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Robert Haas
• 21:30   Moved WIP patches Josh Berkus
• 21:36   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 21:50   SSI tuning points Kevin Grittner
• 22:07   Re: Another swing at JSON Joseph Adams
• 22:34   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Robert Haas
• 22:41   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  Tom Lane
• 22:59   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Bruce Momjian
• 23:19   Re: procpid? Jim Nasby
• 23:31   Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific Brendan Jurd
• 23:32   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't use "cp -i" in the example WALarchive_command. Bruce Momjian
• 23:49   Re: minor patch submission: CREATE CAST ... AS EXPLICIT Brendan Jurd
• 23:57   Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users Andrew Dunstan