On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:49:48PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Does this mean that the open item "more SSI loose ends" can now be
>> marked resolved?
>
> I was just looking at it and contemplating moving it to the non-blockers
> list. Of the five items:
> - (1) and (4) are resolved
> - (2) isn't an issue -- maybe we want to add a comment, someplace but
> I'm not convinced even that is necessary
> - (3) is a regression test, and is already on the list separately
> - (5) is a doc issue only
>
> There are no open issues with the code that I'm aware of.
Perhaps it would be best to remove the general item and replace it
with a list of more specific things that need doing - which might just
mean #5.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
