2010/7/12 Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>:
> Pavel Baroš<baros.p@seznam.cz> wrote:
>> Dne 9.7.2010 21:33, Robert Haas napsal(a):
>
>>> Please add your patch here, so that it will be reviewed during
>>> the about-to-begin CommitFest.
>>>
>>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
>>>
>>
>> OK, but will you help me with that form? Do you think I can fill
>> it like that? I'm not sure about few fields ..
>>
>> Name: Snapshot materialized views
>> CommitFest Topic: [ Miscellaneous | SQL Features ] ???
>
> SQL Features seems reasonable to me.
>
>> Patch Status: Needs review
>> Author: me
>> Reviewers: You?
>
> Leave empty. Reviewers will sign up or be assigned.
>
>> Commiters: who?
>
> That comes much later -- when the patch is complete and has a
> favorable review, then a committer will pick it up.
>
>> and I quess fields 'Date Closed' and 'Message-ID for Original
>> Patch' will be filled later.
>
> Date closed is only set for patches which are committed, returned
> with feedback (for a later CommitFest), or rejected. When you make
> an entry which references a post to the lists, you should fill in
> the Message-ID from the email header of the post. You may be able
> to get this from your email software as soon as you send the post;
> if not, you can find it on the archive page for the post.
This topic hasn't been touched on in nearly a year, but is the work
that's been done so far salvageable? I'm not sure what happens to
GSoC project work that doesn't get finished in time.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
