Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

3 January 2011

• 00:15   Re: contrib/snapshot Andrew Dunstan
• 00:31   Re: Sync Rep Design Hannu Krosing
• 05:54   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Greg Smith
• 06:19   Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support Brar Piening
• 07:55   Re: management of large patches Greg Smith
• 07:58   Re: contrib/snapshot Jim Nasby
• 08:02   Re: page compression Jim Nasby
• 08:03   Re: Recovery conflict monitoring Magnus Hagander
• 08:15   Re: contrib/snapshot Joel Jacobson
• 08:38   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Simon Riggs
• 08:44   Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support Magnus Hagander
• 09:00   Re: Recovery conflict monitoring Simon Riggs
• 09:28   Re: management of large patches Dimitri Fontaine
• 09:35   Re: Recovery conflict monitoring Greg Smith
• 10:00   Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions Magnus Hagander
• 10:11   Re: Sync Rep Design Simon Riggs
• 10:21   Re: Recovery conflict monitoring Magnus Hagander
• 10:26   Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support Brar Piening
• 10:55   Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility Magnus Hagander
• 11:12   Re: pg_dump --split patch Dmitry Koterov
• 11:54   Re: Problems with autovacuum and vacuum JotaComm
• 12:11   SSPI client authentication in non-Windows builds Christian Ullrich
• 12:12   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:36   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Simon Riggs
• 13:39   Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation Alvaro Herrera
• 13:47   Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation Kevin Grittner
• 13:57   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Robert Haas
• 14:03   Re: page compression Robert Haas
• 14:04   Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation Andres Freund
• 14:21   Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either Robert Haas
• 14:25   Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Magnus Hagander
• 14:29   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either Alvaro Herrera
• 14:35   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Robert Haas
• 14:35   Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support Andrew Dunstan
• 14:36   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Magnus Hagander
• 14:37   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Magnus Hagander
• 14:40   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Robert Haas
• 14:42   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Magnus Hagander
• 14:44   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Alvaro Herrera
• 14:45   Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support Brar Piening
• 14:50   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Robert Haas
• 14:56   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Stephen Frost
• 14:59   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:00   Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions Robert Haas
• 15:02   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Robert Haas
• 15:06   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Andrew Dunstan
• 15:09   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:14   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Tom Lane
• 15:17   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Magnus Hagander
• 15:18   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Stephen Frost
• 15:19   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Magnus Hagander
• 15:20   Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions Tom Lane
• 15:21   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Robert Haas
• 15:23   Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions Robert Haas
• 15:29   Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender Stephen Frost
• 15:30   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Simon Riggs
• 15:35   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:36   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Florian Pflug
• 15:50   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Simon Riggs
• 16:01   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:09   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Robert Haas
• 16:15   back branches vs. VS 2008 Andrew Dunstan
• 16:43   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Magnus Hagander
• 16:50   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Robert Haas
• 16:56   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Simon Riggs
• 17:08   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Andrew Dunstan
• 17:19   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Kevin Grittner
• 17:19   Re: pg_dump --split patch Robert Haas
• 17:28   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Magnus Hagander
• 17:33   Re: pg_dump --split patch Joel Jacobson
• 17:34   Re: pg_dump --split patch Tom Lane
• 17:35   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Robert Haas
• 17:50   Re: pg_dump --split patch Joel Jacobson
• 17:50   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Tom Lane
• 17:58   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Magnus Hagander
• 18:01   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Kevin Grittner
• 18:01   Re: pg_dump --split patch Robert Haas
• 18:08   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers (was: Extensions, patch v16) David E. Wheeler
• 18:11   Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid Robert Haas
• 18:13   Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed David E. Wheeler
• 18:18   Re: pg_dump --split patch Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Andrew Dunstan
• 18:26   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Robert Haas
• 18:42   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers (was: Extensions, patch v16) Tom Lane
• 18:43   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers (was: Extensions, patch v16) David E. Wheeler
• 18:46   Re: pg_dump --split patch Joel Jacobson
• 18:47   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers Dimitri Fontaine
• 18:49   Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed Dimitri Fontaine
• 18:51   Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed David E. Wheeler
• 18:51   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers (was: Extensions, patch v16) Tom Lane
• 18:52   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers (was: Extensions, patch v16) David E. Wheeler
• 18:54   Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed Dimitri Fontaine
• 18:55   Re: pg_dump --split patch Robert Haas
• 18:58   Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed David E. Wheeler
• 18:59   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers David E. Wheeler
• 18:59   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Dave Page
• 19:04   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Tom Lane
• 19:15   Re: pg_dump --split patch Dimitri Fontaine
• 19:17   Re: Extension upgrade, patch v0: debug help needed Dimitri Fontaine
• 19:19   Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch Peter Eisentraut
• 19:23   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers Dimitri Fontaine
• 19:24   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Andrew Dunstan
• 19:26   Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 Tom Lane
• 19:50   Re: pg_dump --split patch Robert Haas
• 21:05   Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers David E. Wheeler
• 21:50   Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions Magnus Hagander