Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Date
Msg-id 23928.1294085067@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: back branches vs. VS 2008  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: back branches vs. VS 2008  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: back branches vs. VS 2008  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used
>>> for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to
>>> have the buildfarm test something different form what we're shipping.

>> Are you speaking for EDB on that?

> He's not speaking *for* us, but he's absolutely right.

OK, so what about the next question: is EDB running buildfarm members
that will test the VS version(s) you are using?  I don't think Andrew
is under any obligation to do that for you.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump --split patch