Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikTEaLeuHLgRSenzid_=kSRyWMS32RV5aAOGR=X@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: back branches vs. VS 2008  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>>> And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used
>>>> for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to
>>>> have the buildfarm test something different form what we're shipping.
>
>>> Are you speaking for EDB on that?
>
>> He's not speaking *for* us, but he's absolutely right.
>
> OK, so what about the next question: is EDB running buildfarm members
> that will test the VS version(s) you are using?  I don't think Andrew
> is under any obligation to do that for you.

Yes, except for VC++ 2008/Win7 which we use for 9.0. That one remains
on my todo list.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: back branches vs. VS 2008