Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

17 December 2010

• 01:00   Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw Itagaki Takahiro
• 01:32   Re: range intervals in window function frames Hitoshi Harada
• 01:40   Re: plperlu problem with utf8 Alex Hunsaker
• 01:49   Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw Shigeru HANADA
• 02:25   Re: plperlu problem with utf8 David E. Wheeler
• 03:40   Re: plperlu problem with utf8 Alex Hunsaker
• 06:02   Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) Craig Ringer
• 06:05   Re: ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE WITH Simon Riggs
• 06:47   Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) Magnus Hagander
• 08:18   about error handling mechanism fanng yuan
• 09:02   patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c Pavel Stehule
• 09:14   Re: clang and LLVM Alexandre Riveira
• 10:09   Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) Craig Ringer
• 10:17   Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) Magnus Hagander
• 10:58   Unnecessary limit on max_standby_streaming_delay Magnus Hagander
• 11:18   Re: Unnecessary limit on max_standby_streaming_delay Greg Smith
• 12:08   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Robert Haas
• 12:35   Re: PS display and standby query conflict Robert Haas
• 12:36   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Alvaro Herrera
• 13:27   Re: about error handling mechanism Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:46   Re: clang and LLVM Andrew Dunstan
• 14:14   Re: patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c Tom Lane
• 14:15   ps_status on fastpath Alvaro Herrera
• 14:18   Re: patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c Alvaro Herrera
• 14:18   Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) Tom Lane
• 14:22   Re: Unnecessary limit on max_standby_streaming_delay Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Alvaro Herrera
• 14:25   Re: patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c Pavel Stehule
• 14:27   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: plperlu problem with utf8 David Fetter
• 14:31   Re: clang and LLVM Peter Eisentraut
• 14:32   Re: patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c Pavel Stehule
• 14:33   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 14:36   Re: patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c Tom Lane
• 14:41   Re: ps_status on fastpath Tom Lane
• 14:42   Re: patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c Pavel Stehule
• 14:47   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 14:50   Serializable lock consistency (was Re: CommitFest wrap-up) Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:53   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Merlin Moncure
• 14:59   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 15:00   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Robert Haas
• 15:07   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 15:07   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Alvaro Herrera
• 15:12   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Tom Lane
• 15:14   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts. Robert Haas
• 15:18   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts. Tom Lane
• 15:22   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 15:23   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Robert Haas
• 15:24   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Alvaro Herrera
• 15:25   Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) Craig Ringer
• 15:27   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Alvaro Herrera
• 15:28   Re: Unnecessary limit on max_standby_streaming_delay Peter Eisentraut
• 15:34   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts. Robert Haas
• 15:38   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: Serializable lock consistency (was Re: CommitFest wrap-up) Florian Pflug
• 15:45   Re: clang and LLVM Greg Sabino Mullane
• 15:46   Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) Magnus Hagander
• 16:04   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Merlin Moncure
• 16:08   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Robert Haas
• 16:11   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 16:11   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Dmitriy Igrishin
• 16:11   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Itagaki Takahiro
• 16:13   Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) Magnus Hagander
• 16:14   Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:15   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 16:16   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 16:21   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Merlin Moncure
• 16:23   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Andrew Dunstan
• 16:26   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 16:31   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 16:58   Re: proposal : cross-column stats Tomas Vondra
• 17:20   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) David E. Wheeler
• 17:36   relaxing sync commit if no WAL written (was Re: unlogged tables) Robert Haas
• 17:38   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: plperlu problem with utf8 Alex Hunsaker
• 17:53   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Robert Haas
• 17:58   Re: proposal : cross-column stats Robert Haas
• 17:59   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Andy Colson
• 18:04   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Robert Haas
• 18:06   Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Josh Berkus
• 18:06   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 18:07   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Tom Lane
• 18:07   Re: plperlu problem with utf8 Alex Hunsaker
• 18:08   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:14   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 18:15   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 18:19   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:20   Re: ps_status on fastpath Alvaro Herrera
• 18:22   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Tom Lane
• 18:24   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Pavel Stehule
• 18:25   Re: ps_status on fastpath Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Robert Haas
• 18:31   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Tom Lane
• 18:32   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Robert Haas
• 18:33   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Robert Haas
• 18:35   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Tom Lane
• 18:40   Re: ps_status on fastpath Alvaro Herrera
• 18:43   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Robert Haas
• 18:49   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:58   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 19:02   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Robert Haas
• 19:03   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Tom Lane
• 19:08   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Robert Haas
• 19:08   Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?) Tom Lane
• 19:15   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Tom Lane
• 19:16   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Bill Moran
• 19:24   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Tom Lane
• 19:27   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:31   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:31   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Nathan Boley
• 19:37   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Robert Haas
• 19:39   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Christophe Pettus
• 19:46   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Tom Lane
• 19:47   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Jeff Janes
• 19:49   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Bill Moran
• 19:50   Re: proposal : cross-column stats Tomas Vondra
• 19:51   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Robert Haas
• 19:52   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Bill Moran
• 20:01   typed table casting Peter Eisentraut
• 20:13   Re: proposal : cross-column stats Tomas Vondra
• 20:15   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Tom Lane
• 20:18   Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST Tom Lane
• 20:19   Re: ps_status on fastpath Alvaro Herrera
• 20:21   Re: ps_status on fastpath Tom Lane
• 20:24   Re: proposal : cross-column stats Tom Lane
• 20:41   Re: proposal : cross-column stats Heikki Linnakangas
• 20:41   Re: proposal : cross-column stats Tomas Vondra
• 20:53   Re: ps_status on fastpath Alvaro Herrera
• 21:06   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Josh Berkus
• 21:12   Re: proposal : cross-column stats Tomas Vondra
• 21:13   psql expanded auto Peter Eisentraut
• 21:22   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Marti Raudsepp
• 21:48   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? 
• 22:10   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Josh Berkus
• 22:35   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Robert Haas
• 22:42   mingw make vs shell vs pwd -W Andrew Dunstan
• 22:49   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Josh Berkus
• 23:03   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Robert Haas
• 23:24   Re: psql expanded auto Chris Browne
• 23:30   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Andrew Dunstan
• 23:36   Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? Josh Berkus