Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers?
Date
Msg-id 4D0BEDBE.8080806@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> Well, that's stupidly arbitrary.  If we're not going to accept
>> '1.234e+01'::Integer, then we shouldn't accept 1.234e+01::Integer either.
> 
> It's not arbitrary in the slightest.  One is a run-time type conversion;
> the other is a question of what strings the type-specific input routine
> for integer will accept.

Oh, *I* understand the difference.  Any app developer is going to see it
as stupidly arbitrary, though.

Anyway, this answered my basic question.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers?