Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

11 May 2010

• 00:23   Re: no universally correct setting for fsync Josh Berkus
• 00:27   Re: no universally correct setting for fsync Josh Berkus
• 01:04   Re: no universally correct setting for fsync Greg Smith
• 01:13   Make archiver check for SIGHUP more often? Tom Lane
• 01:42   Re: no universally correct setting for fsync Joshua D. Drake
• 03:20   Invitation to connect on LinkedIn Carlos Jordão
• 04:21   Re: [GENERAL] Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command Fujii Masao
• 04:38   Re: Make archiver check for SIGHUP more often? Fujii Masao
• 04:58   Re: [BUGS] "SET search_path" clause ignored during function creation Takahiro Itagaki
• 05:01   Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful Fujii Masao
• 06:46   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Dmitry Fefelov
• 08:00   Re: no universally correct setting for fsync Yeb Havinga
• 08:03   Re: Patch for PKST timezone Takahiro Itagaki
• 08:45   Re: Patch for PKST timezone Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:22   Re: Adding xpath_exists function Mike Fowler
• 11:29   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Robert Haas
• 12:11   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Marko Tiikkaja
• 12:55   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Nicolas Barbier
• 12:59   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Marko Tiikkaja
• 13:08   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Nicolas Barbier
• 13:11   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Marko Tiikkaja
• 13:19   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Marko Tiikkaja
• 13:50   Re: List traffic Bruce Momjian
• 13:58   Re: List traffic Marc G. Fournier
• 14:05   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: List traffic Magnus Hagander
• 14:07   Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs Kevin Grittner
• 14:10   Re: List traffic Simon Riggs
• 14:23   Re: List traffic Bruce Momjian
• 14:28   SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs) Florian Pflug
• 14:42   Re: List traffic Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: List traffic Simon Riggs
• 15:04   Re: SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs) Robert Haas
• 15:06   Re: Patch for PKST timezone Tom Lane
• 16:08   Re: PATCH: Minor notes in CLUSTER page Robert Haas
• 16:36   Re: SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs) Kevin Grittner
• 16:39   Re: SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs) Florian Pflug
• 16:51   Re: Patch for PKST timezone Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:08   Re: Patch for PKST timezone Tom Lane
• 17:34   C++ keyword in utils/rbtree.h Peter Eisentraut
• 18:00   Re: SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs) Jan Wieck
• 18:14   Re: C++ keyword in utils/rbtree.h Robert Haas
• 18:58   Re: SHARE locks vs. DELETE in SERIALIZABLE mode (Was: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs) Florian Pflug
• 21:46   Re: Patch for PKST timezone Joachim Wieland
• 22:39   Re: Patch for PKST timezone Tom Lane