Re: [GENERAL] Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Archiver not picking up changes to archive_command
Date
Msg-id AANLkTiniEcM9kHs0mOs8RUIoGkhipEJ7PR0DzDPd39qS@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> bricklen <bricklen@gmail.com> writes:
>> Due to some heavy processing today, we have been falling behind on
>> shipping log files (by about a 1000 logs or so), so wanted to up our
>> bwlimit like so:
>
>> rsync -a %p postgres@192.168.80.174:/WAL_Archive/ && rsync
>> --bwlimit=1875 -az %p postgres@14.121.70.98:/WAL_Archive/
>
>> The db is showing the change.
>> SHOW archive_command:
>> rsync -a %p postgres@192.168.80.174:/WAL_Archive/ && rsync
>> --bwlimit=1875 -az %p postgres@14.121.70.98:/WAL_Archive/
>
>> Yet, the running processes never get above the original bwlimit of
>> 1250. Have I missed a step? Would "kill -HUP <archiver pid>" help?
>> (I'm leery of trying that untested though)
>
> A look at the code shows that the archiver only notices SIGHUP once
> per outer loop, so the change would only take effect once you catch up,
> which is not going to help much in this case.  Possibly we should change
> it to check for SIGHUP after each archive_command execution.

+1

Here is the simple patch to do so.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Carlos Jordão
Date:
Subject: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Make archiver check for SIGHUP more often?