Re: no universally correct setting for fsync - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yeb Havinga
Subject Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
Date
Msg-id 4BE90E95.6060100@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: no universally correct setting for fsync  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>  
>   
>> The answer to this is:
>>
>> PostgreSQL.org recommends that this setting be left on at all
>> times.  Turning it off, may lead to data corruption.
>>
>> Anything else is circumstantial and based on knowledge and facts
>> we don't have about environmental factors. 
>>     
>  
> Perhaps Josh's language for fsync could be modified to work here
> (we're now talking about full_page_writes, for anyone who's lost
> track):
>  
> | it is only advisable to turn off fsync if you can easily recreate
> | your entire database from external data.
>  
> That covers bulk loads to an empty or just-backed-up database and
> entirely redundant databases.  Saying it should never be turned off
> would tend to make one wonder why we have the setting at all.
>   
Would the term "entirely redundant databases" include (synchronously) 
replicated databases? (ps: I did indeed lose track about whether this is 
about fsync or full_page_writes and did not get on the track again)

regards,
Yeb Havinga



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Fefelov
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs
Next
From: Takahiro Itagaki
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for PKST timezone