Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

10 September 2008

• 00:06   Re: Keeping creation time of objects David Fetter
• 00:19   Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec Tom Lane
• 00:25   Re: Keeping creation time of objects Gregory Williamson
• 00:29   Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code Tom Lane
• 01:27   Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation Alex Hunsaker
• 01:28   Re: pg_regress inputdir Tom Lane
• 01:41   Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation Alex Hunsaker
• 01:47   Re: Potential Join Performance Issue Tom Lane
• 02:07   Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code Greg Smith
• 02:30   Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code Robert Haas
• 02:51   Re: Keeping creation time of objects Robert Haas
• 03:15   Re: Keeping creation time of objects Andrew Dunstan
• 04:28   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Fujii Masao
• 04:56   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Fujii Masao
• 06:15   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Fujii Masao
• 06:31   Re: Keeping creation time of objects Volkan YAZICI
• 06:39   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Hannu Krosing
• 06:54   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Pavan Deolasee
• 07:16   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 07:20   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 07:57   Re: Keeping creation time of objects Tino Wildenhain
• 08:04   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 08:06   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Markus Wanner
• 08:10   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:16   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Pavan Deolasee
• 08:25   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 08:29   Re: WIP patch: Collation support Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:40   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:44   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Csaba Nagy
• 08:48   Re: WIP patch: Collation support Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:56   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Hannu Krosing
• 08:56   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Hannu Krosing
• 08:56   Re: Keeping creation time of objects Hannu Krosing
• 08:57   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Fujii Masao
• 08:58   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 09:04   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 09:09   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Dimitri Fontaine
• 09:12   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 09:37   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Markus Wanner
• 09:51   Re: WIP patch: Collation support Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:11   Re: WIP patch: Collation support Zdenek Kotala
• 10:17   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 10:23   Re: WIP patch: Collation support Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:39   using hash index when BETWEEN is specified Zdenek Kotala
• 10:52   Re: using hash index when BETWEEN is specified Asko Oja
• 11:24   Re: using hash index when BETWEEN is specified Robert Haas
• 12:14   Base64 decode/encode performance Gaetano Mendola
• 12:25   Re: using hash index when BETWEEN is specified Hannu Krosing
• 13:37   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Aidan Van Dyk
• 13:38   Re: Keeping creation time of objects Alvaro Herrera
• 13:43   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 13:43   Re: Keeping creation time of objects Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 14:01   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Fujii Masao
• 14:13   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Markus Wanner
• 14:31   Re: using hash index when BETWEEN is specified Zdenek Kotala
• 14:31   Re: Base64 decode/encode performance Marko Kreen
• 14:38   Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code Ron Mayer
• 14:44   Re: Base64 decode/encode performance Mark Mielke
• 15:13   Re: New FSM patch Zdenek Kotala
• 15:21   Re: Base64 decode/encode performance tomas@tuxteam.de
• 15:26   Re: Base64 decode/encode performance Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:48   Re: New FSM patch Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:48   Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code Robert Haas
• 15:53   Interesting glitch in autovacuum Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: Keeping creation time of objects David Fetter
• 16:13   Re: using hash index when BETWEEN is specified Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch Jeff Davis
• 17:17   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 17:34   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Tom Lane
• 17:40   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 17:57   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:17   Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication Simon Riggs
• 18:21   Re: Planner question Tom Raney
• 18:28   Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch Robert Haas
• 18:42   Re: Planner question Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: New FSM patch Zdenek Kotala
• 19:54   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Simon Riggs
• 20:11   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Tom Lane
• 20:16   Re: Planner question Tom Raney
• 20:27   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 20:30   Re: Potential Join Performance Issue Simon Riggs
• 20:31   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Simon Riggs
• 21:32   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Tom Lane
• 22:48   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 23:31   Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum Tom Lane
• 23:50   Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec Kevin Grittner