> I meant that -- hypothetically if we did accept the feature as-is -- the
> number of evaluations would be documented to be undefined, not N. That
> would avoid the backwards-compatibility problem.
>
> This one point is probably not worth discussing now, because argument
> #1 and #2 stand on their own.
Agreed. Plus, both Tom and Pavel seem to think this is a relatively
solvable problem.
...Robert
