Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

23 July 2007

• 00:05   Re: syslogging oddity Tom Lane
• 07:53   Re: syslogging oddity Magnus Hagander
• 08:35   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 08:39   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 09:05   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:09   SSPI vs MingW Magnus Hagander
• 09:25   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 10:07   Re: SSPI vs MingW Dave Page
• 12:55   Re: SSPI vs MingW Magnus Hagander
• 13:09   Re: SSPI vs MingW Andrew Dunstan
• 13:32   Re: Full page images in WAL & Cache Invalidation Florian G. Pflug
• 13:36   Oops in fe-auth.c Magnus Hagander
• 14:29   Re: Oops in fe-auth.c Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: SSPI vs MingW Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: Oops in fe-auth.c Magnus Hagander
• 14:40   Re: Full page images in WAL & Cache Invalidation Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: syslogging oddity Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: syslogging oddity Magnus Hagander
• 14:59   Re: syslogging oddity Andrew Dunstan
• 15:05   Why is lc_messages superuser only? Magnus Hagander
• 15:12   Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32 Magnus Hagander
• 15:15   Re: syslogging oddity Tom Lane
• 15:16   Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only? Andrew Dunstan
• 15:20   Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only? Tom Lane
• 15:21   Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:22   Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only? Magnus Hagander
• 15:29   Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32 Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32 Andrew Dunstan
• 16:00   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Alvaro Herrera
• 16:04   Debug a C shared library using Eclipse or Visual C++ 6.0 Aurora Sánchez
• 16:13   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 16:23   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Alvaro Herrera
• 16:30   Re: Full page images in WAL & Cache Invalidation Florian G. Pflug
• 16:34   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Pavan Deolasee
• 16:43   Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32 Magnus Hagander
• 16:52   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Jim Nasby
• 16:52   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Jim Nasby
• 16:59   Re: Oops in fe-auth.c Magnus Hagander
• 17:06   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Alvaro Herrera
• 17:18   Re: Oops in fe-auth.c Tom Lane
• 17:26   Re: Oops in fe-auth.c Tom Lane
• 17:30   Re: Oops in fe-auth.c Magnus Hagander
• 17:36   Re: Full page images in WAL & Cache Invalidation Florian G. Pflug
• 17:44   Re: [GENERAL] 8.2.4 signal 11 with large transaction Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Alvaro Herrera
• 18:22   Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 Tom Lane
• 18:25   supporting 0x00 from client Unicode JDBC Cody Bennett
• 18:54   Re: supporting 0x00 from client Unicode JDBC Andrew Dunstan
• 20:38   Re: [GENERAL] 8.2.4 signal 11 with large transaction Sibte Abbas
• 21:02   Reviewing new index types (was Re: [PATCHES] Updated bitmap indexpatch) Simon Riggs
• 21:19   Re: Reviewing new index types (was Re: [PATCHES] Updated bitmap indexpatch) Tom Lane
• 22:11   Re: Reviewing new index types (was Re: [PATCHES] Updatedbitmap indexpatch) Simon Riggs